Delusions of Grandeur

“Two things have always filled me with awe – the starry heaven above (me) and the moral law within (me)” – Immanuel Kant, Critique of practical Reason.

Deciphering Kubrick.

Posted by Umer Latif on February 25, 2009

kubrickforlookThe art of cinema is a superior and exquisite form of art and direction is the undisputed crown of it. A good direction possesses this unique capability to turn an average script and just-about-the-mark plot into something which can be categorized as a masterpiece. Every once in a while, we witness such strokes of genius on the screen.

Whenever the term direction and good direction pops up, a handful of names emerge in mind right away. Stanley Kubrick, Martin Scorsese, John Ford, Sergio Leon and Alfred Hitchcock are among the godfathers of modern art of direction. Among them, Kubrick’s genius and unique style glisters bright and high. Although most of his masterpieces were controversial yet they depict the depth of his imagination and  the vastness of his vision. His sci-fic masterpiece “2001: A Space Odyssey” happens to be, undoubtedly, one of the greatest movies of all time. I don’t think so any other movie has ever sparked such heated discussions and debates. I personally have seen hundreds of movies, positively the number exceeds 500, but I don’t recall any movie that almost involuntarily compelled me into deep meditations, both from scientific and philosophical aspects. It happens to be one of the most enigmatic, mysterious, thought-provoking, original, imaginative and visionary movies with ground-breaking special effects and score. Beginning from four million years ago and culminating at 2001, this is the story of mankind’s evolution, mental and intellectual more than physical. A tribute to restless and boundless human spirit. Interestingly, the movie contains only 45 minutes of spoken dialogues over a running time of two hours and twenty minutes!
 
Amidst the countless ramblings and renditions, Kubrick never offered any ‘official’ interpretation of the storyline of 2001:ASO. In an interview, he remarked:
 
“… If the film stirs the emotions and penetrates the subconscious of the viewer, if it stimulates, however inchoately, his mythological and religious yearnings and impulses, then it has succeeded.”
 
Clockwork Orange, and ultra-violent film, takes us deep into human nature, morality and complex psychology and the consequences of it being supressed by force. The movie was so controversial that once it was nominated for Oscar, no one was willing to come up and announce the nominations and the winner for best picture, as none wanted their name associated with this controversy. Jack Nicholson, however, an ever-dare-devil, finally plunged in.
 
Kubrick is not for those movie buffs who seek pure entertainment or action. His movies are food for positive though, an intellectual nourishment. And that, to me, is the most important purpose of the art of cinema.

7 Responses to “Deciphering Kubrick.”

  1. Kamran said

    Stanley was hands-down the most imaginative, bold and technically astute director of all times.

    Not to forget the movie which kick-started him into limelight: Dr. Strangelove. To make a black-humor movie about nuclear warfare right after the Cuban Missile Crisis required balls; to execute the idea without making it look stupid required perfection only Kubrick could provide.

    Hands down, the god of movie-making.

    • Umer Latif said

      You can call me an a-hole for not mentioning it, along with Full Metal Jacket, of course. Pure masterpieces. His presentation of Sellers in three roles so different in Dr.Strangelove was indeed a stroke of genius!

  2. Kamran said

    Full Metal Jacket, just like The Shining, is a movie with so many “embedded” secrets which everyone fails to notice the first time. I have lost the links for FMJ, but here’s one for The Shining which analyzes the movie from that particular perspective. It’s mindbogglingly amazing how Kubrick was able to mock everyone from the audience to Stephen King in that single movie without making it blatantly obvious.

  3. Umer Latif said

    lol, that again reminded me of Jackie boy! what else could serve the ‘mocking-end’ more efficiently!

  4. Umer Latif said

    Damn. That’s an entire blog on The Shining! Would be great to read,

  5. Umer Latif said

    Though from metaphorical aspect, I believe 2001:ASO surpasses em all.

  6. Kamran said

    But, of course. If there are extra-terrestrial civilizations in the universe and all nominate movies from their cultures for a giant award show, I’d pick 2001: ASO as Earth’s nomination without even thinking twice about it. From contemplative aspects, that movie reaches almost surreal heights of perfection.

    I still have Spartacus and Barry Lyndon waiting for a go though. Think I’ll see them tomorrow.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>